U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2006

United States v. Campa-Esparza

United States v. Campa-Esparza
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided December 6, 2006 · Reavley, Stewart, Clement
208 F. App'x 328

United States v. Campa-Esparza

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Luis Humberto Campa-Esparza raises arguments that are foreclosed by *329 Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be *329 published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.