United States v. Perez
United States v. Perez
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 27, 2006
Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-11261 Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
FABIAN EMILIO PEREZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:03-CR-424-2-M --------------------
Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Fabian Emilio Perez has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by
Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738(1967). Perez has responded
to counsel’s motion, raising a claim of ineffective assistance of
counsel. We do not reach the issue of ineffective assistance of
counsel because the record has not been adequately developed to
address this issue. United States v. Miller,
406 F.3d 323, 335-
36 (5th Cir.), cert. denied,
126 S. Ct. 207(2005).
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 04-11261 -2-
Our independent review of the brief filed by counsel,
Perez’s response, and of the record discloses no nonfrivolous
issue for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,
and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished