U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2006

United States v. Prado

United States v. Prado
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided December 12, 2006

United States v. Prado

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 12, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-10660 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MARIO PRADO, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:04-CR-254-2 -------------------- Before KING, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Mario Prado has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Prado’s response, discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.