U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2006

United States v. Blacklock

United States v. Blacklock
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided December 12, 2006 · King, Owen, Per Curiam, Wiener
210 F. App'x 347

United States v. Blacklock

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Counsel appointed to represent Harrell Ray Blacklock, Jr., has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. *348 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Blacklock has filed a response and requested the appointment of substitute counsel. Our independent review of counsel’s brief, Blacklock’s response, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, Blacklock’s motion for the appointment of substitute counsel is DENIED, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.