Jorge Armando Garces appeals the sentence imposed following his plea of guilty to one count of possession with intent to distribute more than 100 kilograms of marijuana. He contends that his Sixth Amendment rights were violated because his sentence was based on facts found by the sentencing court by a preponderance of the evidence. He also contends that he was sentenced under mandatory Sentencing Guidelines contrary to United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005).

Garces was sentenced under the post- Booker advisory guidelines scheme which requires the sentencing court to calculate the guideline range in the same manner as before Booker and to make factual findings by a preponderance of the evidence. See United States v. Johnson, 445 F.3d 793, 797-98 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 2884, 165 L.Ed.2d 908 (2006). Garces misunderstands both Booker and his own post-Booker sentencing. Consequently, his appeal presents no issue relevant to his sentence. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.