United States v. Nolasco-Mendez

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
United States v. Nolasco-Mendez, 209 F. App'x 411 (5th Cir. 2006)
King, Owen, Per Curiam, Wiener

United States v. Nolasco-Mendez

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Counsel appointed to represent Alberto Ismael Nolasco-Mendez has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Nolasco-Mendez has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Reference

Full Case Name
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alberto Ismael NOLASCO-MENDEZ, Also Known as Alberto Nolasco-Mendez, Defendant-Appellant
Status
Unpublished