Rondall Mullins appeals the district court’s revocation of his supervised release and imposition of a term of imprisonment. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(g). He argues that the district court erred in not imposing substance-abuse treatment pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3583(d) in lieu of incarceration. Mullins committed several violations of the conditions of his supervised release. Failure of a drug test was but one of those violations. Moreover, the district court considered but rejected the available treatment options. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(d). Accordingly, there was no error in the district court’s revocation of supervised release and imposition of a term of imprisonment.

AFFIRMED.