U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2006

United States v. Phelps

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided May 25, 2006 · Davis, Prado, Reavley

181 F. App'x 472

Counsel

Joseph A. Florio, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, James Andrew Hensariing, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, Austin, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee., Ronald P. Guyer, Law Offices of Ronald P. Guyer, San Antonio, TX, Nancy Blair Barohn, Kansas City, MO, for Defendant-Appellant.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM: *

The judgment of the district court is affirmed for the reasons given in its order dated January 4, 2005. The court there found that Charles Phelps Jr. failed to prove that he owned an interest in the forfeited property. That finding is supported by the evidence and is free of error. *473Any pending motions are denied.

AFFIRMED.

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.