U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2006

United States v. Ramirez

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided August 25, 2006 · Davis, Smith, Wiener

195 F. App'x 238

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Joel Ramirez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Ramirez has not filed a response to counsel’s motion. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accord*239ingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.