U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2006

United States v. Rodriguez

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided August 25, 2006 · Davis, Smith, Wiener

195 F. App'x 253

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM: *

Counsel appointed to represent Ramona Rodriguez has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Rodriguez has filed a pro se appellate brief in response to counsel’s motion to withdraw. Our independent review of the briefs and *254the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cíe. R. 42.2.

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.