U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2006

United States v. Schmidt

United States v. Schmidt
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided October 25, 2006 · Demoss, Jolly, Stewart
203 F. App'x 602

United States v. Schmidt

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Adam Schmidt has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Schmidt has not responded to counsel’s motion. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief shows that there are no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, *603and this appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.