U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2006

United States v. Flores

United States v. Flores
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided December 12, 2006 · King, Owen, Wiener
209 F. App'x 413

United States v. Flores

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Carlos Flores has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Flores received a copy of counsel’s motion but filed no response. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accord*414ingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cíe. R. 42.2.

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.