Marcus M. Williams appeals the sentence that he received after he pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm. Williams argues that the district court erred when it enhanced his sentence pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(5) because he would not be convicted for “another felony offense” in light of Louisiana jurisprudence applying La.Rev.Stat. 14:27. Williams’s argument is unavailing. Commentary to the Guideline explicitly states that a conviction need not be obtained for the Guideline to apply. § 2K2.1(b)(5), comment, (n. 4). Moreover, the offense conduct as set forth in the Presentence Report supports the district court’s determination that Williams possessed a firearm and ammunition in connection with another felony offense. See United States v. Gonzales, 436 F.3d 560, 584 (5th Cir. 2006). Williams’s challenge to the reasonableness of his sentence, which was within the applicable guidelines range of imprisonment, is likewise unavailing. See United States v. Alonzo, 435 F.3d 551, 554 (5th Cir. 2006); United States v. Ruff, 984 F.2d 635, 640 (5th Cir. 1993).

AFFIRMED.