United States v. Jones
United States v. Jones
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 14, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III No. 04-51211 Clerk Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ROY LEE JONES, Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 1:03-CR-191-ALL -------------------- Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:* Counsel appointed to represent Roy Lee Jones has filed a motion to withdraw and brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Jones has filed a response. Our independent review of the brief, Jones’s response, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Jones’s motion for the appointment of new counsel is DENIED.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.