Phillip Joseph Crow pleaded guilty to assault of a federal employee and using and carrying a firearm during a crime of violence. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 111(a)(1), 111(b), and 1114; 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A). He appeals the sentence imposed for his assault offense. Crow asserts that a six-level enhancement to his offense level under U.S.S.G. § 3A1.2(b) was improper because the enhancement was based on the district court’s clearly erroneous finding that Crow’s assault was motivated by the victim’s status as a government employee. Based on the record as a whole, such a finding was plausible and therefore not clearly erroneous. See United States v. Gonzales, 436 F.3d 560, 584 (5th Cir. 2006).

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.