Ramon Chavez-Ramirez (Chavez-Ramirez) appeals his conviction and sentence for illegal reentry. He argues that the district court misapplied the Sentencing Guidelines by characterizing his state felony conviction for possession of a controlled substance as an “aggravated felony” under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(C).

Given the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Lopez v. Gonzales, — U.S.-, 127 S.Ct. 625, 166 L.Ed.2d 462 (2006), Chavez-Ramirez’s argument, as conceded by the Government, has merit. See United States v. Estrada-Mendoza, 475 F.3d 258, 260-61 (5th Cir. 2007). Accordingly, Chavez-Ramirez’s sentence is vacated, and the case is remanded for resentencing in light of Lopez.

Because the Government has conceded that he is entitled to resentencing based on the district court’s erroneous § 2L1.2(b)(l)(C) enhancement, Chavez-Ramirez requests that he be allowed to withdraw the remaining issues raised on appeal. His motion to withdraw and remand should be granted.

AFFIRMED IN PART; VACATED IN PART AND REMANDED; MOTION GRANTED.