U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2007

United States v. Diaz-Maldonado

United States v. Diaz-Maldonado
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided April 5, 2007 · Jones, Higginbotham, Clement
224 F. App'x 404

United States v. Diaz-Maldonado

Opinion

*405 PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Apolinar Diaz-Maldonado raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.