Travers Earl Crumpton, Texas inmate # 675506, appeals the district court’s dismissal as moot of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint challenging conditions of confinement at the Texas Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ) Segovia Unit and other TDCJ facilities. Crumpton argues that the district court should have certified the lawsuit as a class action.

The denial of Crumpton’s motion for certification as a class action was within the discretion of the district court. See Pederson v. Louisiana State University, 213 F.3d 858, 866 (5th Cir. 2000). As Crumpton is no longer incarcerated at the Segovia Unit or another allegedly inadequate TDCJ facility identified in his lawsuit, his claims are moot. See Oliver v. Scott, 276 F.3d 736, 741 (5th Cir. 2002); Herman v. Holiday, 238 F.3d 660, 665 (5th Cir. 2001). We do not address Crumpton’s *445 argument concerning monetary damages because Crumpton did not request monetary damages in the district court. See Greenberg v. Crossroads Sys., Inc., 364 F.3d 657, 669 (5th Cir. 2004).

AFFIRMED.