U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2007

United States v. Giles

United States v. Giles
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided May 2, 2007

United States v. Giles

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT May 2, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 06-30477 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CHARLES EDWARD GILES, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 3:05-CV-1068 USDC No. 3:02-CR-30015-ALL --------------------

Before DeMOSS, STEWART, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:* Charles Edward Giles received a mandatory life sentence after being found guilty by a jury of distribution of marijuana, distribution of over 5 grams of cocaine base, and possession with intent to distribute over 50 grams of cocaine base. Giles appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. The district court granted Giles a certificate of appealability on the issue whether his attorney was ineffective * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

No. 06-30477 -2- for presenting a defense at trial that is not recognized under the law. The defense presented is recognized. See, e.g., United States v. Moye, 951 F.2d 59, 61 & n.1 (5th Cir. 1992); United States v. Johnston, 685 F.2d 934, 936-37, 940 (5th Cir. 1982).

Giles thus has not established that his counsel rendered ineffective assistance. See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984).

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.