Shawn Michael Rounds pleaded guilty to possession with the intent to distribute more than 5 kilograms of cocaine, and the district court sentenced him to 87 months of imprisonment. Rounds now appeals his sentence, arguing that, because he was merely a co-driver, the district court erred in finding that he did not qualify for a downward adjustment for being a minimal or minor participant in the offense. A defendant’s role in the offense is a factual determination that this court reviews for clear error. United States v. Villanueva, 408 F.3d 193, 203 (5th Cir. 2005).

The advisory Sentencing Guidelines provide for a reduction in the base offense level of a “minor” or a “minimal” participant. U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2. A defendant who is “a courier without being substantially less culpable than the average participant” does not qualify for this adjustment. United States v. Buenrostro, 868 F.2d 135, 138 (5th Cir. 1989); U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2, comment. (n. 3(A)). In light of the testimony at his sentencing hearing, Rounds has not shown that the district court clearly erred in finding that he did not qualify for a downward adjustment based on his role in the offense. See Buenrostro, 868 F.2d at 138.

AFFIRMED.