U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2007

United States v. Wells

United States v. Wells
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided April 18, 2007 · Higginbotham, Benavides, Prado
225 F. App'x 255

United States v. Wells

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Counsel appointed to represent Nathan Wells on appeal has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Wells has not responded to counsel’s motion. Our independent review of counsel’s brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.