United States v. Rodriguez-Saucedo
United States v. Rodriguez-Saucedo
226 F. App'x 435
United States v. Rodriguez-Saucedo
Opinion
Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Gustavo Rodriguez-Saueedo raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is *436 GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
*
Pursuant to 5th Cir R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.