Former state prisoner Willie Norris Barker appeals the dismissal with prejudice of his pro se, in forma pauperis “Independent Action” as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). Barker’s reliance on Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) to challenge a prior conviction is misplaced. See Hess v. Cockrell, 281 F.3d 212, 216-17 (5th Cir. 2002); United States v. O’Keefe, 169 F.3d 281, 289-90 (5th Cir. 1999). Furthermore, Barker did not raise a mental illness claim in the instant proceeding. Barker’s appeal is frivolous. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

APPEAL DISMISSED.