Cesar Armando Medrano-Garcia (Medrano) appeals the 64-month sentence he received following his guilty-plea conviction for illegal reentry, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He does not specifically argue that the sentence he received was unreasonable. Instead, he challenges the constitutionality of the presumption of reasonableness this court affords sentences imposed within a properly calculated guidelines range, relying on the Supreme Court’s grant of certiorari in Rita v. United States, — U.S. -, 127 S.Ct. 551, 166 L.Ed.2d 406 (2006) (No. 06-5754), and Claiborne v. United States, — U.S. -, 127 S.Ct. 551, 166 L.Ed.2d 406 (2006) (No. 06-5618).

The grant of certiorari in Rita and Claiborne has no impact on this court’s precedent. See United States v. Short, 181 F.3d 620, 624 (5th Cir. 1999); see also Ellis v. Collins, 956 F.2d 76, 79 (5th Cir. 1992). Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.