Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, David Kent raises arguments that are foreclosed by United States v. Stone, 306 F.3d 241, 243 (5th Cir. 2002), which held that no Sixth Amendment violation arises when a district court considers the existence of prior convictions rather than presenting the question to a jury in sentencing the defendant under the Armed Career Criminal Act. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.