Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Benedicto Arana-Ascencio preserves for further review his contention that his sentence is unreasonable because this court’s post-Booker ** rulings have effectively reinstated the mandatory Sentencing Guideline regime condemned in Booker. Arana-Ascencio concedes that his argument is foreclosed by United States v. Mares, 402 F.3d 511 (5th Cir. 2005), and its progeny, which have outlined this court’s methodology for reviewing sentences for reasonableness. The appellant’s motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.