United States v. Hanson
United States v. Hanson
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 20, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III No. 05-51306 Clerk Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus KEVIN MICHAEL HANSON, Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:05-CR-795-1 -------------------- Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Kevin Michael Hanson has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Hanson has filed a response to counsel’s motion. Our independent review of counsel’s brief, Hanson’s response, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 05-51306 -2- Hanson’s motion for the appointment of a new attorney and to set a briefing schedule is DENIED. See United States v. Wagner, 158 F.3d 901, 902-03 (5th Cir. 1998).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.