Edgar Enrique Moreno-Ortiz, a native and citizen of Columbia, petitions this court for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) decision affirming the Immigration Judge’s (IJ) denial of his application for relief under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). Because Moreno-Ortiz is alien removable as an aggravated felon, this court’s jurisdiction over his petition for review is limited solely to constitutional claims or questions of law. 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(C) and (D).

Moreno-Ortiz argues that the IJ applied the incorrect legal standard to his claim for relief under the CAT and that his substantive due process rights under the state-created danger exception will be violated if he is removed to Columbia.

This court previously held that it did not have jurisdiction to review Moreno-Ortiz’s first petition for review and Moreno-Ortiz has not demonstrated why his current constitutional claim could not have been presented in his first petition. 8 U.S.C. § 1252(d)(2); see Medina v. INS, 993 F.2d 499, 503 (5th Cir. 1993). This court is therefore without jurisdiction to review Moreno-Ortiz’s constitutional claim.

We further find that the IJ clearly set forth the proper legal standard to be applied in determining whether Moreno-Ortiz is entitled to protection under the CAT. Because the IJ articulated the correct standard, Moreno-Ortiz has failed to raise a true question of law over which this court has jurisdiction. See Delgado-Reynua v. Gonzales, 450 F.3d 596, 599-600 (5th Cir. 2006).

Accordingly, Moreno-Ortiz’s petition for review is DISMISSED.