United States v. Decker
United States v. Decker
Opinion
Philip Mark Decker appeals his sentence following a guilty plea to uttering counterfeit obligations in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 472. Decker argues that the district court erred in denying a reduction in his offense level for acceptance of responsibility.
*368 Because Decker did not admit all of the conduct relevant to his offense, the district court’s determination that he did not accept responsibility is not without foundation. See United States v. Washington, 340 F.3d 222, 227 (5th Cir. 2003).
AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.