Byron Keith Darbonne pleaded guilty to two counts of using a communication facility to facilitate the commission of a felony. Darbonne expressly waived the right to appeal his conviction and sentence. Darbonne, however, reserved the right to appeal if the district court imposed a sentence that was not in accordance with the terms of the agreement or if ineffective assistance of counsel affected the validity of the waiver of appeal. The district court sentenced Darbonne to 48 months of imprisonment on each count with the terms to be served consecutively, for a total of 96 months in prison.

Darbonne argues that his sentence was unreasonable following United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). The Government argues that the waiver clause is valid and should be enforced. The record reflects that Darbonne knowingly and voluntarily waived his appellate rights. See United States v. Melancon, 972 F.2d 566, 567-68 (5th Cir. 1992). Consideration of Darbonne’s Booker-related claim is barred by the plain language of the waiver. See United States v. Bond, 414 F.3d 542, 544 (5th Cir. 2005). Accordingly, we do not consider the merits of Darbonne’s sentencing challenge, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.