Benjamin Lazaro-Beltran (Lazaro) appeals the 24-month sentence he received following his guilty-plea conviction for possessing with the intent to distribute more than 50 kilograms of marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a). He challenges the presumption of reasonableness that attaches to a sentence imposed within a properly calculated guidelines range, relying on the Supreme Court’s grant of cer-tiorari in Rita v. United States, — U.S. -, 127 S.Ct. 551, 166 L.Ed.2d 406 (2006). After the parties filed their briefs in the instant case, the Supreme Court issued its decision, holding that a court of appeals may apply a presumption of reasonableness to a properly calculated guideline sentence. Rita v. United States, — U.S. -, 127 S.Ct. 2456, — L.Ed.2d - (2007). Accord United States v. Alonzo, 435 F.3d 551, 554 (5th Cir. 2006) (applying presumption of reasonableness to properly calculated guideline sentence).

Lazaro’s sentence is within a properly calculated advisory guideline range and entitled to great deference. See United States v. Mares, 402 F.3d 511, 520 (5th Cir. 2005). Giving such deference to Lazaro’s sentence, we conclude that Lazaro has failed to rebut the presumption that his sentence is reasonable. Alonzo, 435 F.3d at 554. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.