Hector Garza Flores appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to conspiracy to distribute or possess with intent to distribute gamma hydroxybutrate, methylenedioxy-methamphetamine, cocaine, cocaine base, methamphetamine, and marijuana. The Government has moved for summary affirmance. (The Government’s alternative motion for an ex *264 tension of time to file its brief is DENIED as unnecessary).

Flores maintains his 210-month Guidelines sentence violates United, States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005) and is unreasonable. The presumption of reasonableness afforded a sentence within a properly calculated advisory Guidelines range is consistent with Booker. See Rita v. United States, - U.S. -, 127 S.Ct. 2456, 2462, 168 L.Ed.2d 203 (2007). The record reflects the district court considered Flores’ claims, the presentence investigation report’s recommendations, the applicable Guidelines range, and the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors. Because the district court exercised its discretion to impose a sentence within a properly calculated guidelines range, the sentence is presumptively reasonable, and we may infer that the district court considered all the factors for a fair sentence set forth in the Guidelines. See Rita, 127 S.Ct. at 2462-70; United States v. Alonzo, 435 F.3d 551, 554 (5th Cir. 2006); United States v. Mares, 402 F.3d 511, 520 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1056, 126 S.Ct. 718, 163 L.Ed.2d 615 (2005).

SUMMARY AFFIRMANCE GRANTED; JUDGMENT AFFIRMED.