U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2007

United States v. Hazley

United States v. Hazley
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided August 21, 2007 · Higginbotham, Smith, Clement
236 F. App'x 135

United States v. Hazley

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Gerald Glenn Hazley has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Hazley has filed a response. The record is insufficiently developed to allow consideration at this time of Hazley’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. See United States v. Cantwell, 470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir. 2006). Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Hazley’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.