U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2007

United States v. Studnicka

United States v. Studnicka
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided August 21, 2007 · Higginbotham, Smith, Clement
236 F. App'x 129

United States v. Studnicka

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Sean Alen Studnicka has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Studnicka has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. The Government’s motion to dismiss is DENIED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.