Marisol Berber-Ramirez appeals from her 24-month sentence resulting from her guilty-plea conviction for illegal reentry, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.

Berber-Ramirez argues that the district court misapplied the Sentencing Guidelines by characterizing her state felony conviction for possession of a controlled substance as an “aggravated felony” for purposes of U.S.S.G. 2L1.2(b)(l).

We review Berber-Ramirez’s challenge to the district court’s application of the Sentencing Guidelines de novo. See United States v. Villegas, 404 F.3d 355, 359-61 (5th Cir. 2005). As the Government concedes, Berber-Ramirez’s argument has merit in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Lopez v. Gonzales, — U.S. -, 127 S.Ct. 625, 166 L.Ed.2d 462 (2006). See United States v. Estrada-Mendoza, 475 F.3d 258, 259-61 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 127 S.Ct. 1845, 167 L.Ed.2d 340 (2007). Accordingly, Berber-Ramirez’s sentence is vacated, and the ease is remanded for resentencing in light of Lopez.

SENTENCE VACATED; REMANDED FOR RESENTENCING.