Luis Raul Ramirez-Palomo appeals his concurrent 108-month sentences for importing and possessing with the intent to distribute cocaine. Ramirez-Palomo argues that his Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial was violated because the district court found facts used to determine his guideline range of imprisonment. “[W]ith the mandatory use of the Guidelines excised, the Sixth Amendment will not impede a sentencing judge from finding all facts relevant to sentencing.” United States v. Johnson, 445 F.3d 793, 798 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 2884, 165 L.Ed.2d 908 (2006). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.