Carlos Rodriguez appeals his guilty-plea conviction and sentence for conspiracy to transport and harbor illegal aliens within *361 the United States for commercial advantage and private financial gain in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(l)(A)(ii), (a)(l)(A)(iii), (a)(l)(B)(i), and (a)(l)(A)(v)(I). He contends that the district court clearly erred when it enhanced his offense level for possession of a firearm pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2Ll.l(b)(4)(C) (2005) because it was not foreseeable that his co-conspirators would have possessed firearms during the conspiracy.

The district court’s determination that it was reasonably foreseeable that Rodriguez’s co-conspirators possessed firearms during the conspiracy was plausible in light of the record read as a whole. Although there was no direct evidence that Rodriguez knew his co-conspirators possessed firearms, there was sufficient evidence from which the district court could infer that it was reasonably foreseeable that his co-conspirators possessed firearms. See United States v. Gaytan, 74 F.3d 545, 559 (5th Cir. 1996). Therefore, the district court did not clearly err when it enhanced Rodriguez’s offense level for possession of a firearm pursuant to § 2L1.1(b)(4)(C). See United States v. Charon, 442 F.3d 881, 887 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 127 S.Ct. 260, 166 L.Ed.2d 202 (2006). Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.