In these consolidated appeals, Plaintiffs-Appellants Brookshire Brothers Holding, Inc., Brookshire Brothers Management, Inc., and Brookshire Brothers, Ltd. (collectively, “Brookshire”) appeal the district court’s judgments dismissing their claims against Defendants-Appellees Tony Adam-son, Homer Holden, Jay Wright, and Jim Lawrence (collectively, “Defendants”) 1 for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). The district court, however, dismissed the action against Defendants on two independent grounds: (1) failure to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6); and (2) lack of personal jurisdiction under Rule 12(b)(2). On appeal, Brookshire does not purport to challenge the district court’s dismissals based on lack of personal jurisdiction. Consequently, we dismiss these appeals. Cf. John Doe # 1 v. Veneman, 380 F.3d 807, 814 (5th Cir. 2004) (recognizing that “ ‘a federal court has neither the power to render advisory opinions nor to decide questions that cannot affect the rights of litigants in the case before them’ ”) (quoting Preiser v. Newkirk, 422 U.S. 395, 401, 95 S.Ct. 2330, 45 L.Ed.2d 272 (1975) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted)).

DISMISSED.