U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2007

United States v. Venegas

United States v. Venegas
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided October 3, 2007 · Jolly, Davis, Wiener
249 F. App'x 386

United States v. Venegas

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Arturo Venegas raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal of *387 fense. United, States v. Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), petition for cert, filed (Aug. 28, 2007) (No. 07-6202). The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.