Elizabeth Orphey appeals the dismissal of her employment discrimination suit as time-barred. She acknowledges that she had 90 days from September 22, 2006, in which to sue; she sued on December 22, 2006, which was the 91st day. Her only justification for avoiding the 90-day bar is that Thanksgiving Day, which occurred during the 90-day period, should not be counted.

There is no legal support for Orphey’s position. The 90-day provision is strictly construed, and Orphey does not contend otherwise. See Taylor v. Books A Million, Inc., 296 F.3d 376, 379 (5th Cir. 2002) (suit filed three days late); Ringgold v. Nat’l Maint. Corp., 796 F.2d 769, 770 (5th Cir. 1986) (per curiam) (two days late); Espinoza v. Mo. Pac. R.R., 754 F.2d 1247, 1251 (5th Cir. 1985) (same). There is no provision for excluding holidays that fall within the period of days to be counted.

The judgment of dismissal is AFFIRMED.