Proceeding pro se, Marilyn Boniaby appeals on the sole ground that the arbitration agreement she signed is invalid because of procedural uneonscionability. To show that, a plaintiff must present evidence of the defendant’s “overreaching or sharp practices” combined with the plaintiffs “ignorance or inexperience.” Fleetwood Enter., Inc. v. Gaskamp, 280 F.3d 1069, 1077 (5th Cir.), modified on other grounds on denial of rehearing, 303 F.3d 570 (5th Cir. 2002) (per curiam). Nothing in the record reflects the sort of sharp practices the courts have required to establish uneonscionability, nor has Boniaby indicated she was incapable of understanding the acknowledgement she signed.

The district court properly compelled arbitration, and the judgment is AFFIRMED.