Dexter Bufkin, federal prisoner #29726-018, challenges the denial of Otis Bufkin’s claim of a legal interest in certain property subject to forfeiture in Dexter Bufkin’s guilty-plea conviction for interstate travel with the intent to distribute methamphetamine. Generally, “a party may not appeal a district court’s order to champion the rights of another.” Rohm & Hass Texas, Inc. v. Ortiz Bros. Insulation, Inc., 32 F.3d 205, 208 (5th Cir. 1994). Under 21 U.S.C. § 853(n)(2), “[a]ny person, other than the defendant, asserting a legal interest in property which has been ordered forfeited to the United States may ... petition the court for a hearing to adjudicate the validity of his alleged interest in the property.” Otis Bufkin filed such a petition. See § 853(n). Dexter Bufkin has no standing to file such a petition and has no standing to appeal the court’s denial of Otis Bufkin’s petition. See § 853(n); Rohm & Hass Texas, Inc., 32 F.3d at 208.

APPEAL DISMISSED.