Gustavo Chacon, who pleaded guilty to one count of bulk cash smuggling, in violation of 31 U.S.C. § 5332, appeals his sentence. Chacon argues that the district court’s application of U.S.S.G. § 2S1.3(b)(1)(B) (2006), in addition to determining the base offense level based on the value of the funds, constituted impermissible double counting.

Section § 2S1.3 applies to several monetary-reporting related offenses, including bulk cash smuggling. See § 2S1.3; U.S.S.G.App. A (Statutory Index). It does not prohibit, but requires, application of both the offense level increase based on the value of the funds and the specific-offense-characteristic increase because the offense involved bulk cash smuggling. There was no impermissible double counting. See United States v. Simmons, 470 F.3d 1115, 1128-29 (5th Cir. 2006), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 127 S.Ct. 3002, 168 L.Ed.2d 731 (2007).

Chacon’s grouping argument lacks merit. Because Chacon was convicted on only one count, there was nothing to group, and U.S.S.G. § 3D1.2 is inapplicable. See U.S.S.G. § 3Dl.l(a).

AFFIRMED.