Raymundo Sandoval appeals from the 60-month sentence imposed following the revocation of his term of supervised release, arguing that his sentence was unreasonable under United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). The district court properly considered the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors when imposing Sandoval’s sentence. See United States v. Gonzalez, 250 F.3d 923, 930 (5th Cir. 2001). Sandoval’s sentence, which was the statutory maximum, was neither unreasonable nor plainly unreasonable. See *386 United States v. Hinson, 429 F.3d 114, 120 (5th Cir. 2005).

Sandoval also argues that the district court violated the Sixth Amendment when it revoked his release and imposed an additional prison term based on facts found only by a preponderance of the evidence. Sandoval acknowledges that this argument is foreclosed by Hinson, 429 F.3d at 119, but raises it to preserve it for further review.

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.