United States v. Rodriguez-Valdez
United States v. Rodriguez-Valdez
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit
FILED December 5, 2007 No. 07-40778 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
RAMIRO RODRIGUEZ-VALDEZ
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:07-CR-232-ALL
Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Ramiro Rodriguez-Valdez raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States,
523 U.S. 224, 235(1998), which held that
8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. See United States v. Pineda-Arrellano,
492 F.3d 624, 625(5th Cir. 2007), petition for cert. filed (Aug. 28, 2007) (No. 07-6202). The appellant’s motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished