John E. Goree, Texas prisoner # 1334846, appeals the dismissal without prejudice of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Goree argues that the Texas Department of Criminal Justice’s (TDCJ) grievance procedure was not the proper means to address his complaints and that the 1-60 complaint procedure was an appropriate alternative which satisfied the exhaustion requirement. He also argues that the unsanitary conditions at the Travis County jail and the absence of durable utensils and drinking cups violated his Eighth Amendment rights.

After the district court’s judgment, the Supreme Court held “that failure to exhaust is an affirmative defense under the PLRA, and that inmates are not required to specially plead or demonstrate exhaustion in their complaints.” Jones v. Bock, --- U.S. ---, 127 S.Ct. 910, 921, 166 L.Ed.2d 798 (2007). As this action was dismissed prior to service on the defendants, and it is not clear from the complaint that Goree exhausted his administrative remedies, the district court erred by sua sponte dismissing Goree’s suit. See Carbe v. Lappin, 492 F.3d 325, 328 (5th Cir. 2007).

*870 The district court’s judgment is VACATED and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with Jones.