U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2007

United States v. Renteria-Contreras

United States v. Renteria-Contreras
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided November 8, 2007 · King, Barksdale, Dennis
253 F. App'x 421

United States v. Renteria-Contreras

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jacob Renteria-Contreras raises ar *422 guments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. United States v. Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), petition for cert. filed (Aug. 28, 2007) (No. 07-6202). The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be *422 published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.