United States v. Raymundo-Bautista
United States v. Raymundo-Bautista
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit
FILED December 5, 2007 No. 07-50630 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
JOSE CRUZ RAYMUNDO-BAUTISTA
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:06-CR-787-1
Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jose Cruz Raymundo- Bautista raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States,
523 U.S. 224, 235(1998), which held that
8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. United States v. Pineda-Arrellano,
492 F.3d 624, 625(5th Cir. 2007), petition for cert. filed (Aug. 28, 2007) (No. 07-6202). The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished