U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2007

United States v. Saldana

United States v. Saldana
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided December 12, 2007 · Reavley, Barksdale, Garza
257 F. App'x 820

United States v. Saldana

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Herman Saldana, Jr., raises arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by United States v. De Jesus-Batres, 410 F.3d 154, 162 (5th Cir. 2005), which held that proof of specific intent to violate immigration laws is not an element of the offense of alien harboring. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is *821 GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.