U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2007

United States v. Valdez-Serrato

United States v. Valdez-Serrato
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided December 12, 2007 · Reavley, Barksdale, Garza
257 F. App'x 829

United States v. Valdez-Serrato

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Armando Valdez-Serrato raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. See United States v. Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), petition for cert. filed (Aug. 28, 2007) (No. 07-6202). The appellant’s motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.